TURKPULSE No:57..........DECEMBER 110th, 2001

Economy
Minister Kemal Dervis expects a totally different economy in Turkey by
mid-2002 provided that some unexpected events concerning political stability
or in foreign policy do not mess it all up. The economy is bottoming out for
the last two months and debt servicing will not be too much of a problem in
the following months due to the successful fiscal performance and $3 billion
surplus in current accounts by the end of the year. This successful
performance, however, is not devoid of threats and pitfalls, believe the
economy rulers.
Unbelievable
for the Turkish economy: the dollar has been losing value in its parity with
the TL for the last seven weeks. The process is slow, but reliable and
steady. The main reason is what Pulse (Issue
No: 55, page 2) first pointed out in the media, the
commencement of de-dolarization of the Turkish economy, after a rapid
dolarization process caused and encouraged by external forces after the TL
was left to float as from February 21st.
Impact of 21 February shock is disappearing
As a
result of this dolarization fever triggered off by foreign banks, the dollar
jumped from TL680,000 on February 19th to over TL1 million within
two days to start with and touched the TL1.7 million level at the beginning
of October, constantly rising due to high demand. Business tycoon Sakip
Sabanci’s Akbank, along with a few foreign banks such as Citibank, HSBC
and some German banks made handsome profits by buying $5.2 billion from the
Central Bank within two days at TL680,000. It was definitely a case of
illegal inside trading and even worse than that because the IMF chief,
Stanley Fischer, forced Turkey to float the TL. All the international
finance quarters were naturally aware of what it meant, but only Akbank and
a few foreign banks were lucky enough to make such enormous purchases of the
dollar at fixed rates in such a short time as two days. Why did the Central
Bank sell $5.2 billion in these critical two days is another story of
treason that we bypass for now.
Treason,
profiteering, stealing or whatever it may be called, the Turkish nation
suffered bitterly in 2001 because of this IMF operation, but the sound
principles of the free market economy, the supply-and-demand mechanism, have
now begun to operate and the dollar parity has been going down for the last
seven weeks with the commencement of de-dolarization. On October 19th
the dollar stood at TL1,644,000. By the end of last week, on December 7th,
after a steady drop it fell to TL1,451,000. The appreciation of the TL could
be faster, but the Central Bank is going out of its way to slow it down and
the Dervis team in charge of the economy, rightly or wrongly, says that it
is better to be slow in making improvements in the economy.
According
to this team, the world will see a totally different Turkey in the economy
as from the second half of 2002 unless some unexpected developments,
especially foreign policy developments or unfavourable political stability
factors, forestall it. They also believe that the post-September 11th
period helped Turkey in transcending these economic problems, as Ankara
promptly and energetically joined Washington in setting in motion Article 5
of the NATO Charter against international terrorism.
Dervis complains of lack of coordination in the economy
The
economy rulers believe that the prerequisite for this prospective economic
breakthrough in the New Year is political stability. Whether or not they do
their part for this stability is, however, different.
Economy
Minister Kemal Dervis said in Brussels last week (4th) that the
State Planning Organisation unilaterally prepared the Pre-accession Economic
Program (PEP) of Turkey for the European Union. “The
responsibility for drawing up this report was handed to the SPO in January
2001. It was prepared by the SPO without any consultations with the other
economic units and handed to the EU with a 10-day delay. It caused a bit of
a problem in Brussels. Turkey was the only candidate country that could not
present its medium-term economic strategy to the Union,” said
Dervis.
The SPO
Chief, Akin Izmirlioglu, was prompt to answer the charges. On Thursday (6th)
he told a press conference in Ankara that he was given the duty of preparing
PEP on January 15th, that they sought the views of other economic
units and held two meetings for coordination. Eleven departments and
agencies, including the Treasury, attended the second meeting on September
27th and the text finalised there was presented to the High
Planning Council. The revisions made on the basis of the economic aggregates
handed to the SPO by the HPC on October 11th was signed by all
the ministers present including Dervis himself, said Izmirlioglu. It covered
the medium term projections and strategy for the 2001-2005 period and
consequently Dervis’s charges were unfounded, he stressed. He also said
that the report was presented to the EU through the Foreign Ministry in time
and without any delay.
Planning
Undersecretary Izmirlioglu is attached to Deputy PM Devlet Bahceli
(MHP-Osmaniye) and the press conference was held with Bahceli’s
instructions. In other words, the whole affair was a fresh sign of strife
between the MHP and Kemal Dervis, and PM Ecevit urged both sides to refrain
from such arguments in public.
Whether
or not such arguments in public, prejudicial to coalition
solidarity, will recur in future despite the Prime Minister’s instructions
is not so important as the two-and-a-half year old tripartite coalition is
bent on not disrupting this government before general elections are held in
April 2004. If Dervis continues with such unwise statements, which he mostly
makes when he is abroad on duty, he will further lose his influence in the
government and it may go as far as continuing the government without him.
The coalition partners have come to believe that Washington or the IMF would
not risk their relations with Turkey for the sake of Dervis who has hitherto
proved to be inexperienced and clumsy in politics.
Secretary
of State Colin Powell was urged in Ankara last week to write off Turkey’s
military debts and to accord trade facilities to Turkey. Ambassador Pearson
said on December 7th that the United States would lift half of
the textile quotas for Turkish exports on January 1st, 2002 and
these quotas would disappear for everyone at the end of 2004. Washington is
also considering Turkey’s suggestion of free trade area rules between the
two countries.
Ankara
now believes that Turkey’s firm stance and fight against international
terrorism is showing its effect on the American stance in favour of the
Turkish economy.
Remarked
that the concessions Turkey was giving on Cyprus and ESDI (European Security
and Defence Identity) were being rewarded by the United States in the
economy, PM Ecevit said last week, “It
is obvious that we are giving no concessions on any question. These two (political
issues and the economy) have to be
separate. But I believe that the US suggestions play an important role in
the World Bank and the IMF’s generous contributions to the Turkish
economy.”
Fiscal
discipline is in order, says the Finance Minister.
The
second prerequisite of the economy rulers for the success in the economy by
mid-2002 is achieving fiscal discipline. The Government has reluctantly
accepted the IMF’s condition that there will be a 6.5% (of the GDP)
surplus in the budget, excluding interest payments. This means TL7.1
quadrillion (TL7,157 trillion to be exact) cut in public spending and it
will be achieved by TL3,584 trillion savings and TL3,573 trillion new
revenue in the budget.
Finance
Minister Sumer Oral (ANAP-Izmir) boasts that they more than achieved this
6.5% surplus target this year and promises to continue with the fiscal
discipline in the New Year. By the end of next February, the government
intends to pass the new Expenditure Bill, the Public Tenders Bill and new
rules for foreign capital.
One of
the main instruments for achieving these savings in the budget is pensioning
off public sector workers and civil servants. The circular the government
issued for public saving calls for pensioning off workers above 50 by giving
them their severance pay. As against the uproar of the opposition and trade
unions against this allegedly “forced retirement”, PM Ecevit announced
last Friday (7) that no one would be forced to retire. The number of
applicants for retirement had already surpassed the necessary number, he
said. State Minister Mehmet Kececiler (ANAP-Konya) said that there were
26,500 workers above the age of 50 in the public sector and the applications
for retirement had already reached 30,000. That was why there was no
question of forced retirement.
Kececiler
has also made a warning, which PM Ecevit shared. He said that there were one
million vacant cadres in the public sector. Unless these cadres were
abolished by law, a populist government could hastily fill them at election
time and all the public saving efforts would then be wasted. Kececiler
refrained from accusing his coalition partner, but it was clearly an
expression of the anxiety felt against the MHP’s past practices under
Alpaslan Turkes when he was the party chairman.
For
instance, it was quite difficult to persuade the Agriculture Minister Husnu
Yusuf Gokalp (MHP-Sivas) to discontinue subsidies to farm products as the
IMF has been pressing for. It was only thanks to MHP Chairman Devlet
Bahceli’s help that the other coalition partners finally talked Gokalp
into reducing the agricultural subsidies to five oil seeds in 2002.
Another
important economic measure for the success of the economic stability program
is to take measures for the chronic failure in Turkey’s privatisation
program and new incentives for foreign capital which remain below $1 billion
a year, despite all efforts. Special emphasis will be paid to the
continuation of the privatisation of POAS (the Petrol Office) and TUPRAS
(oil refineries) in the first quarter of the year. It will also help the
public saving program by reducing public sector employees by 61,000 within a
two-echelon program that is being prepared by the Treasury.
“Fine adjustment” in the banking sector
The main
economic achievement of the outgoing year has been the painful, but quite
successful reform in the banking sector. The BDDK (Banking Regulation and
Supervision Agency) has been established and is settling down as a watchdog
for Turkish banks and the banking system.
The
number of distressed banks taken over by the Central Bank’s Fund rose to
19 last week with Toprakbank, a
medium-size bank, being put under State receivership.
The
“fine adjustment” in the pipeline for the banking system concerns
gaining these 19 banks to the Turkish economy by restoring or liquidating
them. While Yurtbank, Sumerbank, Esbank, Iktisat, Kent and Bayindir banks
are more difficult and costly to liquidate, Demirbank, Yasarbank, Ulusal
Bank, Sitebank and Tarisbank are more promising as they were put under
receivership because their liabilities were temporarily above their assets
during the November 2000 and February 2001 financial crises, while the first
group is more seriously in default. With the addition of Toprakbank’s 8000
depositors and shareholders, the number of victims has approached 45,000,
including some Germans in the Munich Stock Exchange.
Now that
BDDK has settled down and is fully authorised to regulate these distressed
banks the system is being carefully scrutinised to recover the losses of
innocent shareholders who have had no fault in the failings of the bank
managements concerned.
The
productive manufacturing industry that suffered bitterly from the hardships
of the outgoing year is showing signs of recovery. The Government reduced
the VAT (Value Added Tax) rates for white products and it made a very
healthy impact on the manufacturing industry in melting down its inventory.
Now the entire industrial sector is following suit and reducing their prices
in order to get rid of their high inventories.
The 4.2%
inflation rate in November was below estimates and all these have spurred
the Istanbul Stock Exchange in recent weeks, while the interest rates and
the dollar parity went down. With the prospective arrival of foreign
investments this trend may gain momentum. In short, light is seen at the end
of the tunnel for the Turkish economy. uras@ada.net.tr
- December 10th, 2001
![]()